What makes the gruesome killing of
Father Jacques Hamel all the more frightening is the impossibility of preventing such crimes. An elderly
priest saying morning Mass for a small weekday congregation could hardly be more vulnerable. His
quiet Normandy town of Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray
would never stand out as high risk. After previous
outrages by terrorists claiming allegiance to Islamic
State (IS) such as the attack in Nice earlier this month,
French security measures were subject to minute
scrutiny by politicians and the media, and by the
security agencies themselves, to pinpoint mistakes and
learn lessons. In this case, however, that is frustratingly
hard to do. Although at least one of Father Hamel’s
assassins was apparently known to the French security
services, they must have hundreds of such suspects on
their books, and it must be nigh impossible to watch
them all effectively round the clock.
So it seems probable this 84-year-old curate was chosen by IS precisely for his vulnerability. Catholics have a particular sensitivity for those who suffer innocent death. That Father Hamel would have died defenceless within sight of a crucifix makes his murder all the more poignant and painful to contemplate. He paid the highest price that his vocation demands. Yet the thought of having to say Mass behind locked doors is repugnant. Most priests will prefer to face the risk.
Is there more they can do? Faced with atrocities of this kind, the usual response by Church leaders is to call for more dialogue. Yet the one thing that is sure about these so-called soldiers of so-called Islamic State is that they are not interested in, nor capable of,
The joint report by two parliamentary select committees into the collapse of the BHS retail chain could hardly have been more devastating. It was “the culmination of a sorry litany of failures of corporate governance and greed” – a judgement which neatly identifies both the systemic and the moral factors involved. Sir Philip Green, knighted in 2006 for his services to the retail industry, is accused of draining the financial lifeblood out of the company for his and his family’s personal enrichment, and then walking away leaving a deficit of more than £500 million in the company pension fund.
Yet it is not clear Sir Philip broke any rules, though his financial arrangements were complex. He is now coming under pressure to make good the pension deficit out of his personal fortune, which is considerably greater than the sum required and by which he supports an ostentatious lifestyle. Among the pressures on him is the threat to remove his knighthood, though so far his general attitude is defiant. It appears that any other business executive would be free, as the law stands, to do as he has done.
This highlights one of the more unexpected features of Theresa May’s package of policies that she launched prior to becoming Prime Minister and repeated since – her commitment to corporate governance reform. While most personal incomes in the United Kingdom have stagnated over the last ten years, the average income of company directors has rocketed. Clearly any kind of dialogue. Nevertheless dialogue, including building relationships across cultural boundaries, has a substantial role to play. Commentators on French community relations, including Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, president of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, have identified ignorance on both sides as a key factor that needs to be addressed.
So it seems probable this 84-year-old curate was chosen by IS precisely for his vulnerability. Catholics have a particular sensitivity for those who suffer innocent death. That Father Hamel would have died defenceless within sight of a crucifix makes his murder all the more poignant and painful to contemplate. He paid the highest price that his vocation demands. Yet the thought of having to say Mass behind locked doors is repugnant. Most priests will prefer to face the risk.
Is there more they can do? Faced with atrocities of this kind, the usual response by Church leaders is to call for more dialogue. Yet the one thing that is sure about these so-called soldiers of so-called Islamic State is that they are not interested in, nor capable of,
The joint report by two parliamentary select committees into the collapse of the BHS retail chain could hardly have been more devastating. It was “the culmination of a sorry litany of failures of corporate governance and greed” – a judgement which neatly identifies both the systemic and the moral factors involved. Sir Philip Green, knighted in 2006 for his services to the retail industry, is accused of draining the financial lifeblood out of the company for his and his family’s personal enrichment, and then walking away leaving a deficit of more than £500 million in the company pension fund.
Yet it is not clear Sir Philip broke any rules, though his financial arrangements were complex. He is now coming under pressure to make good the pension deficit out of his personal fortune, which is considerably greater than the sum required and by which he supports an ostentatious lifestyle. Among the pressures on him is the threat to remove his knighthood, though so far his general attitude is defiant. It appears that any other business executive would be free, as the law stands, to do as he has done.
This highlights one of the more unexpected features of Theresa May’s package of policies that she launched prior to becoming Prime Minister and repeated since – her commitment to corporate governance reform. While most personal incomes in the United Kingdom have stagnated over the last ten years, the average income of company directors has rocketed. Clearly any kind of dialogue. Nevertheless dialogue, including building relationships across cultural boundaries, has a substantial role to play. Commentators on French community relations, including Cardinal Jean-Louis Tauran, president of the Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue, have identified ignorance on both sides as a key factor that needs to be addressed.
A young Muslim, ignorant of his own faith and prey
to radicalisation, may come to believe that Catholics are
his sworn enemy. He may also be surrounded by other
Muslims, less fanatical than he, who also have
erroneous beliefs about Catholicism – that it has not
changed since the medieval Crusades, for instance.
They may know nothing about current Church
teaching urging Catholics to respect members of other
faiths, and to work together on shared projects for the
common good. In such a climate, anti-Catholic
fanaticism would not stand out as much as it should. It
could go unchallenged. A person displaying it is
unlikely to be reported to the authorities by those
amongst whom he lives. Dialogue is about replacing
false perceptions with true ones, and emphasising what
is held in common. Effective communication with
Muslims of goodwill may limit the impact of extremists.
The French Government has a large stake in improving community relations, and knows that the jihadists’ tactics are aimed at driving a wedge between sections of French society. The increasing popularity of Marine Le Pen’s Front National is an Islamist success story. Hence a political programme aimed at promoting national unity, preventing radicalisation and encouraging moderate Muslim leadership is all the more imperative. Ambivalence is not enough.
(Source: The Tablet July 28)
The French Government has a large stake in improving community relations, and knows that the jihadists’ tactics are aimed at driving a wedge between sections of French society. The increasing popularity of Marine Le Pen’s Front National is an Islamist success story. Hence a political programme aimed at promoting national unity, preventing radicalisation and encouraging moderate Muslim leadership is all the more imperative. Ambivalence is not enough.
(Source: The Tablet July 28)
No comments:
Post a Comment